Thursday, June 30, 2011

West Hollywood bans retail sales of dogs and cats | Comments Blog | Los Angeles Times

 

The West Hollywood City Council has put an end to sales of dogs and cats in pet stores.

In an ordinance that passed unanimously Tuesday night, sales of animals in stores are now prohibited in the city.

The ordinance, unanimously approved at its first reading a few weeks ago, is just the latest piece of animal-welfare legislation the city has taken up. In 2003, West Hollywood became the first city in the country to outlaw the declawing of cats.

West Hollywood bans retail sales of dogs and cats | Comments Blog | Los Angeles Times

Meghan Daum: Why San Francisco's pet ban won't fly - latimes.com

 

Dear San Francisco,
Will you please get a life? First you passed a law prohibiting the sale of most Happy Meals. Then you set your sights on banning circumcision. Now you're trying to make it illegal to sell almost every kind of pet, including goldfish, within city limits.

In one way, this isn't entirely surprising. In order to buy a goldfish, you usually need to carry it home in a plastic Ziploc bag. You haven't banned those yet, only plastic grocery bags, but it can only be a matter of time. (Transporting a live fish in one of those eco-bags? Sounds a little dicey.)


And come on, how are kids supposed to learn the facts of life if they can't beg their parents to buy them a fish, forget to change the water in its bowl and stand there crying when it gets flushed down the toilet after it dies from bacterial poisoning? These are teachable moments to be cherished.


Look, San Francisco, I know your intentions are good. With shelters full of adoptable animals, it's more than a little heartbreaking to walk past a pet store and see doggies in the window that undoubtedly came from puppy mills. If a major metropolitan area like yourself banned the sale of cats and dogs, it would be a boon to animals, especially if you found a way to grant exceptions to smaller-scale, responsible breeders, a point your officials say they're still discussing.


But apparently that wasn't enough. Last year, the ban on the sale of cats and dogs was put on hold when your Commission of Animal Control and Welfare decided to extend the prohibition to "anything with fur or feathers," which would include hamsters, rats, guinea pigs and all manner of birds.

And as if the resulting media mockery wasn't enough (Bill O'Reilly, predictably, branded all San Franciscans "kooks"), the authors of the proposal used the extra time to up the ante by adding fish, reptiles and amphibians to the ban. (The proposal would not affect selling live animals for human consumption, raising the question of whether aquarium enthusiasts will soon be buying castles and little scuba-diver figurines for new home lobster tanks.)


Here's your problem, San Francisco: You don't realize that social legislation is like garlic. When used sparingly, it can provide a useful kick to a dish. When overused, it makes people run away every time you open your mouth.

Meghan Daum: Why San Francisco's pet ban won't fly - latimes.com

Anti-circumcision movement anti-Semitic says San Francisco City Attorney | Dan Schreiber | Local | San Francisco Examiner

 

A circumcision ban measure on the November ballot contains clearly anti-Semitic campaign material and targets members of the Jewish faith, according to a press release Thursday from the San Francisco City Attorney’s Office.


Jewish groups, along with some Muslim individuals, filed a lawsuit over the measure last week against The City’s director of elections and Lloyd Schofield, the San Francisco resident who gathered more than 12,000 signatures to get the proposed ban on the ballot.


Groups that filed the suit argue that state law prevents local jurisdictions from restricting medical practice by “healing arts professionals” and that the ban would limit First Amendment rights to free religious practice.
The ban would make male circumcision a misdemeanor punishable by a $1,000 fine and up to a year in jail.


The City Attorney’s Office release said while it normally reserves judgment on pre-election challenges, the circumcision ban is a special case because of comic books depicting Jewish mohels as sinister villains, material that was endorsed by the organization seeking the ban.
The release said the comic books are “darkly evocative of Nazi propaganda of the 1930s and 1940s.”

Anti-circumcision movement anti-Semitic says San Francisco City Attorney | Dan Schreiber | Local | San Francisco Examiner

Philosemitism: France: anti-Semitic Dieudonné shooting first "popular comedy on the Holocaust"

 

The film poster shows French comic actor Dieudonné, dressed in military uniform and hilarious, feeding a tiny portion of food [is it food?] to a hungry man dressed as a concentration camp prisoner begging for something to eat. The subtitle of the film refers to "the first popular comedy about the Holocaust". According to the poster, the film has been preemptively banned from cinemas and video outlets in France. It will be sold through Dieudonné's website.

Philosemitism: France: anti-Semitic Dieudonné shooting first "popular comedy on the Holocaust"

Veterans Allege VA Censoring Prayer

 

HOUSTON - Local veterans say the Department of Veterans Affairs is consistently censoring their prayers, banning them from saying the words "God," and "Jesus" during funeral services at Houston National Cemetery.

Veterans Allege VA Censoring Prayer